Cloxacillin benzathine-loaded polymeric nanocapsules: Physicochemical characterization, cell uptake, and intramammary antimicrobial effect.

The present work shows the development and evaluation of the veterinary antibiotic cloxacillin benzathine (CLOXB) loaded into poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanocapsules (NC), as a potential new treatment strategy to manage bovine intramammary infections, such as mastitis. Staphylococcus aureus-induced mastitis is often a recurrent disease due to the persistence of bacteria within infected cells. CLOXB-PCL NC were prepared by interfacial deposition of preformed biodegradable polymer followed by solvent displacement method. The mean diameter of NC varied from 241 to 428 nm and from 326 to 375 nm, when determined by dynamic light scattering and by atomic force microscopy, respectively. The zeta potential of NC was negative and varied from -28 to -51 mV. In vitro release studies from the NC were performed in two media under sink conditions: PBS with 1% polyethylene glycol or milk. A reversed-phase HPLC method was developed to determine the NC entrapment efficiency and kinetics of CLOXB release from the NC. Free CLOXB dissolution occurred very fast in both media, while drug release from the NC was slower and incomplete (below 50%) after 9 h. CLOXB release kinetics from polymeric NC was fitted with the Korsmeyer-Peppas model indicating that CLOXB release is governed by diffusion following Fick's law. The fluorescence confocal microscopy images of macrophage-like J774A.1 cells reveal NC uptake and internalization in vitro. In addition, antimicrobial effect of the intramammary administration of CLOXB-PCL NC in cows with mastitis resulted in no clinical signs of toxicity and allowed complete pathogen elimination after treatment. The in vivo results obtained in this work suggest that CLOXB-PCL NC could be a promising formulation for the treatment of intramammary infections in cattle, considering their physicochemical properties, release profiles and effects on bovine mastitis control.

Algorithms for monitoring warfarin use: Results from Delphi Method.

Warfarin stands as the most prescribed oral anticoagulant. New oral anticoagulants have been approved recently; however, their use is limited and the reversibility techniques of the anticoagulation effect are little known. Thus, our study's purpose was to develop algorithms for therapeutic monitoring of patients taking warfarin based on the opinion of physicians who prescribe this medicine in their clinical practice. The development of the algorithm was performed in two stages, namely: (i) literature review and (ii) algorithm evaluation by physicians using a Delphi Method. Based on the articles analyzed, two algorithms were developed: "Recommendations for the use of warfarin in anticoagulation therapy" and "Recommendations for the use of warfarin in anticoagulation therapy: dose adjustment and bleeding control." Later, these algorithms were analyzed by 19 medical doctors that responded to the invitation and agreed to participate in the study. Of these, 16 responded to the first round, 11 to the second and eight to the third round. A 70% consensus or higher was reached for most issues and at least 50% for six questions. We were able to develop algorithms to monitor the use of warfarin by physicians using a Delphi Method. The proposed method is inexpensive and involves the participation of specialists, and it has proved adequate for the intended purpose. Further studies are needed to validate these algorithms, enabling them to be used in clinical practice.

Algorithms for monitoring warfarin use: Results from Delphi Method / Algoritmos para monitorar o uso de varfarina: resultados do método Delphi

Summary Warfarin stands as the most prescribed oral anticoagulant. New oral anticoagulants have been approved recently; however, their use is limited and the reversibility techniques of the anticoagulation effect are little known. Thus, our study's purpose was to develop algorithms for therapeutic monitoring of patients taking warfarin based on the opinion of physicians who prescribe this medicine in their clinical practice. The development of the algorithm was performed in two stages, namely: (i) literature review and (ii) algorithm evaluation by physicians using a Delphi Method. Based on the articles analyzed, two algorithms were developed: "Recommendations for the use of warfarin in anticoagulation therapy" and "Recommendations for the use of warfarin in anticoagulation therapy: dose adjustment and bleeding control." Later, these algorithms were analyzed by 19 medical doctors that responded to the invitation and agreed to participate in the study. Of these, 16 responded to the first round, 11 to the second and eight to the third round. A 70% consensus or higher was reached for most issues and at least 50% for six questions. We were able to develop algorithms to monitor the use of warfarin by physicians using a Delphi Method. The proposed method is inexpensive and involves the participation of specialists, and it has proved adequate for the intended purpose. Further studies are needed to validate these algorithms, enabling them to be used in clinical practice.

Resumo A varfarina é o anticoagulante oral mais prescrito. Novos anticoagulantes orais foram recentemente aprovados; porém, o uso é restrito e as técnicas de reversibilidade do efeito anticoagulante ainda são pouco conhecidas. Assim, este estudo propõe o desenvolvimento de um algoritmo para o monitoramento terapêutico de pacientes em uso de varfarina, com base na opinião de médicos que utilizam esse fármaco na prática clínica. O desenvolvimento do algoritmo foi realizado em dois estágios: (i) revisão da literatura e (ii) avaliação do algoritmo por médicos, segundo o método Delphi. Com base na análise dos artigos, dois algoritmos foram desenvolvidos: "Recomendações para o uso de varfarina na terapia anticoagulante" e "Recomendações para o uso de varfarina na terapia anticoagulante: ajuste de dose e controle de sangramento". Posteriormente, os algoritmos foram analisados por 19 médicos que responderam ao convite e aceitaram participar da pesquisa. Desses, 16 responderam a primeira rodada, 11, a segunda e oito, a terceira. Houve um consenso de 70% ou mais na maioria das questões e 50% para seis questões. Assim, foi possível desenvolver algoritmos para o monitoramento do uso de varfarina por médicos, utilizando o método Delphi. O método proposto é de baixo custo e envolve a participação de médicos especialistas, revelando-se adequado para o fim pretendido. Mais estudos são necessários para validar esses algoritmos, permitindo que eles sejam usados na prática clínica.

Effect of Different Sampling Schedules on Results of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies: Evaluation by Means of Monte Carlo Simulations.

Bioavailability and bioequivalence study is one of the most frequently performed investigations in clinical trials. Bioequivalence testing is based on the assumption that 2 drug products will be therapeutically equivalent when they are equivalent in the rate and extent to which the active drug ingredient or therapeutic moiety is absorbed and becomes available at the site of drug action. In recent years there has been a significant growth in published papers that use in silico studies based on mathematical simulations to analyze pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drugs, including bioavailability and bioequivalence aspects. The goal of this study is to evaluate the usefulness of in silico studies as a tool in the planning of bioequivalence, bioavailability and other pharmacokinetic assays, e.g., to determine an appropriate sampling schedule. Monte Carlo simulations were used to define adequate blood sampling schedules for a bioequivalence assay comparing 2 different formulations of cefadroxil oral suspensions. In silico bioequivalence studies comparing different formulation of cefadroxil oral suspensions using various sampling schedules were performed using models. An in vivo study was conducted to confirm in silico results. The results of in silico and in vivo bioequivalence studies demonstrated that schedules with fewer sampling times are as efficient as schedules with larger numbers of sampling times in the assessment of bioequivalence, but only if Tmax is included as a sampling time. It was also concluded that in silico studies are useful tools in the planning of bioequivalence, bioavailability and other pharmacokinetic in vivo assays.

Average bioequivalence of single 500 mg doses of two oral formulations of levofloxacin: a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study in healthy adult Brazilian volunteers

Average bioequivalence of two 500 mg levofloxacin formulations available in Brazil, Tavanic(c) (Sanofi-Aventis Farmacêutica Ltda, Brazil, reference product) and Levaquin(c) (Janssen-Cilag Farmacêutica Ltda, Brazil, test product) was evaluated by means of a randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover study performed in 26 healthy Brazilian volunteers under fasting conditions. A single dose of 500 mg levofloxacin tablets was orally administered, and blood samples were collected over a period of 48 hours. Levofloxacin plasmatic concentrations were determined using a validated HPLC method. Pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, Tmax, Kel, T1/2el, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. Bioequivalence was determined by calculating 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) for the ratio of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf values for test and reference products, using logarithmic transformed data. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs and laboratory analysis results, by subject interviews and by spontaneous report of adverse events. 90% CIs for Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf were 92.1% - 108.2%, 90.7% - 98.0%, and 94.8% - 100.0%, respectively. Observed adverse events were nausea and headache. It was concluded that Tavanic(c) and Levaquin(c) are bioequivalent, since 90% CIs are within the 80% - 125% interval proposed by regulatory agencies.

A bioequivalência média de duas formulações de levofloxacino disponíveis no Brasil, Tavanic(c) (Sanofi-Aventis Farmacêutica Ltda, Brasil, produto referência) e Levaquin(c) (Janssen-Cilag Farmacêutica Ltda, Brasil, produto teste) foi determinada por meio da realização de ensaio aleatório, aberto, cruzado, com dois períodos e duas sequências, em 26 voluntários sadios em condições de jejum. Amostras de sangue dos voluntários foram obtidas ao longo de um período de 48 horas após administração de dose única de 500 mg de levofloxacino. As concentrações plasmáticas do fármaco foram determinadas por método cromatográfico validado. Os parâmetros farmacocinéticos Cmax, Tmax, Kel, T1/2el, AUC0-t e AUC0-inf foram calculados por análise não compartimental. A bioequivalência foi determinada pelo cálculo de intervalos de confiança 90% (IC 90%) para as razões entre os valores de Cmax, AUC0-t e AUC0-inf obtidos para os produtos teste e referência, usando dados transformados logaritmicamente. A tolerabilidade foi avaliada pelo acompanhamento dos sinais vitais e resultados de exames laboratoriais, por consultas e por relato espontâneo dos voluntários. ICs 90% para Cmax, AUC0-t e AUC0-inf foram 92.1% - 108.2%, 90.7% - 98.0%, e 94.8% - 100.0%, respectivamente. Os eventos adversos observados foram náusea e cefaleia. Concluiu-se que os produtos Tavanic(c) e Levaquin(c) são bioequivalentes, uma vez que os ICs 90% estão dentro da faixa de 80%-125% proposta pelas agências reguladoras.

HPLC-DAD and UV-spectrophotometry for the determination of lychnopholide in nanocapsule dosage form: validation and application to release kinetic study.

Simple and sensitive methods using high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD) and ultraviolet (UV)-spectrophotometry were developed and compared to quantify lychnopholide (LYC) in poly-ε-caprolactone nanocapsules and to study its release kinetics. Both methods were validated concerning their specificity, linearity, limits of detection and quantification, precision, accuracy and stability. HPLC-DAD analyses were conducted using an RP C18 column, isocratic elution with a methanol-water (60:40 v/v) mobile phase at 0.8 mL/min flow rate and detection at 265 nm. The linear response (r(2) > 0.999) was obtained within a concentration range of 2-25 µg/mL using HPLC-DAD and 5-40 µg/mL using spectrophotometry. Intra-day and inter-day precision were obtained with low relative standard deviation values. The accuracy of the methods was within the range 98-101% for HPLC-DAD and from 96-100% for UV-spectrophotometry. Both methods were suitable to be applied for the determination of drug loading percentage (>96%) and encapsulation efficiency (>90%). Furthermore, the sensitivity of HPLC-DAD method allows studies of LYC release/dissolution in sink conditions. LYC presented 100% dissolution after 24 h, whereas only 60% of LYC was released from the nanocapsule dosage form, with no burst effect. The methods fulfilled all validation parameters evaluated for LYC quantification in the polymeric nanocapsules and have proven to be accurate, selective and sensitive in the previously mentioned applications.

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of cyclobenzaprine tablets.

The purpose of this study was to investigate cyclobenzaprine pharmacokinetics and to evaluate bioequivalence between two different tablet formulations containing the drug. An open, randomized, crossover, single-dose, two-period, and two-sequence design was employed. Tablets were administered to 23 healthy subjects after an overnight fasting and blood samples were collected up to 240 hours after drug administration. Plasma cyclobenzaprine was quantified by means of an LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters related to absorption, distribution, and elimination were calculated. Cyclobenzaprine plasma profiles for the reference and test products were similar, as well as absorption pharmacokinetic parameters AUC (reference: 199.4 ng ∗ h/mL; test: 201.6 ng ∗ h/mL), Cmax (reference: 7.0 ng/mL; test: 7.2 ng/mL), and T(max) (reference: 4.5 h; test: 4.6 h). Bioequivalence was evaluated by means of 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of AUC (93%-111%) and C(max) (93%-112%) values for test and reference products, which were within the 80%-125% interval proposed by FDA. Cyclobenzaprine pharmacokinetics can be described by a multicompartment open model with an average rapid elimination half-life (t(1/2)ß) of 3.1 hours and an average terminal elimination half-life (t(1/2)γ) of 31.9 hours.

HPLC-FLD methods to quantify chloroaluminum phthalocyanine in nanoparticles, plasma and tissue: application in pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies.

Analytical and bioanalytical methods of high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (HPLC-FLD) were developed and validated for the determination of chloroaluminum phthalocyanine in different formulations of polymeric nanocapsules, plasma and livers of mice. Plasma and homogenized liver samples were extracted with ethyl acetate, and zinc phthalocyanine was used as internal standard. The results indicated that the methods were linear and selective for all matrices studied. Analysis of accuracy and precision showed adequate values, with variations lower than 10% in biological samples and lower than 2% in analytical samples. The recoveries were as high as 96% and 99% in the plasma and livers, respectively. The quantification limit of the analytical method was 1.12 ng/ml, and the limits of quantification of the bioanalytical method were 15 ng/ml and 75 ng/g for plasma and liver samples, respectively. The bioanalytical method developed was sensitive in the ranges of 15-100 ng/ml in plasma and 75-500 ng/g in liver samples and was applied to studies of biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of AlClPc.

Bioequivalence evaluation of single doses of two tramadol formulations: a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study in healthy Brazilian volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Tramadol is a well tolerated and effective analgesic used to treat moderate to severe pain. Several generic formulations of tramadol are available in Brazil; however, published information regarding their bioequivalence in the Brazilian population is not available. A study was designed for Brazilian regulatory authorities to allow marketing of a generic formulation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the bioequivalence of 2 commercial tablet preparations containing tramadol 100 mg marketed for use in Brazil. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, 2 x 2 crossover study was performed in healthy Brazilian volunteers under fasting conditions with a washout period of 12 days. Two tablet formulations of tramadol 100 mg (test and reference formulations) were administered as a single oral dose, and blood samples were collected over 24 hours. Tramadol plasma concentrations were quantified using a validated HPLC method. A plasma concentration-time profile was generated for each volunteer and then mean values were determined, from which C(max), T(max), AUC(0-infinity) k(e), and t(1/2) were calculated using a noncompartmental model. Bioequivalence between the products was determined by calculating 90% CIs for the ratios of C(max) AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity), values for the test and reference products using log-transformed data. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs (temperature, blood pressure, heart rate), laboratory tests (hematology, blood biochemistry, hepatic function, urinalysis), and interviews with the volunteers before medication administration and every 2 hours during the study. RESULTS: Twenty-six healthy volunteers (13 men, 13 women) were enrolled in and completed the study. Mean (SD) age was 30 (6.8) years (range, 21-44 years), mean weight was 64 (8.3) kg (range, 53-79 kg), and mean height was 166 (6.4) cm (range, 155-178 cm). The 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax (1.01-1.17), AUC(0-t) (1.00-1.13), and AUC(0-infinity). (1.00-1.14) values for the test and reference products fell within the interval of 0.80 to 1.25 proposed by most regulatory agencies, including the Brazilian regulatory body. No clinically important adverse effects were reported; only mild somnolence was reported by 4 volunteers and mild headaches by 5 volunteers, and there was no need to use medication to treat these symptoms. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic analysis in these healthy Brazilian volunteers suggested that the test and reference formulations of tramadol 100-mg tablets met the regulatory requirements to assume bioequivalence based on the Brazilian regulatory definition.

Bioequivalence assay between orally disintegrating and conventional tablet formulations in healthy volunteers.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate bioequivalence of two commercial 8 mg tablet formulations of ondansetrona available in the Brazilian market. In this study, a simple, rapid, sensitive and selective liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method is described for the determination of ondansetron in human plasma samples. The method was validated over a concentration range of 2.5-60 ng/ml and used in a bioequivalence trial between orally disintegrating and conventional tablet ondansetron formulations, to assess its usefulness in this kind of study. Vonau flash (Biolab Sanus Farmacêutica, Brazil, as test formulations) and Zofran (GlaxoSmithKline, Brazil, as reference formulation) were evaluated following a single 8 mg dose to 23 healthy volunteers of both genders. The dose was administered after an overnight fast according to a two-way crossover design. Bioequivalence between the products was determinated by calculating 90% confidence interval (90% CI) for the ratio of C(max), AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity) values for the test and reference products, using logarithmically transformed data. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of C(max) (87.5-103.8%), AUC(0-t) (89.3-107.2%) and AUC(0-infinity) (89.7-106.0%) values for the test and reference products is within the 80-125% interval, proposed by FDA, EMEA and ANVISA. It was concluded that two ondansetron formulations are bioequivalent in their rate and extent of absorption.

Bioequivalence and pharmacokinetics of two zidovudine formulations in healthy Brazilian volunteers: an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-way crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Zidovudine is a thymidine nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with activity against HIV type 1. Some (approximately 8) generic formulations of zidovudine are available in Brazil; however, based on a literature search, information concerning their bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties in the Brazilian population has not been reported. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties of 2 capsule formulations of zidovudine 100 mg in healthy Brazilian volunteers. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, 2-way crossover study utilized a 1-week washout period between doses. Blood samples were collected for 8 hours after a single dose of zidovudine 100-mg test (Zidovudina, Fundação para o Remédio Popular, São Paulo, Brazil) or reference formulation (Retrovir, GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania). Plasma zidovudine concentrations were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection at 265 nm. C(max), T(max), AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), t(1/2), and the elimination constant (k(e)) were determined using noncompartmental analysis. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% CIs for C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) fell within the interval of 80% to 125%,the regulatory definition set by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). RESULTS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (12 males, 12 females; mean age, 27 years; weight, 60 kg; height, 167 cm) were enrolled and completed the study. The 90% CIs of the treatment ratios for the logarithmic transformed values of C(max), AUC(max)0-t, and AUC(0-infinity) were 80.0% to 113.6%, 93.9% to 109.7%, and 93.6% to 110.1%, respectively. The values for the test and reference formulations were within the FDA bioequivalence definition intervals of 80% to 125%. CONCLUSIONS: In this small study in healthy subjects, no statistically significant differences in C(max), AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) were found between the test and reference formulations of zidovudine 100-mg capsules. The 90% CIs for the mean ratio values for the test and reference formulations of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and C(max) indicated that the reported data were entirely within the bioequivalence acceptance range proposed by the FDA of 80% to 125% (using log-transformed data).

Bioequivalence study of two oral formulations of cefadroxil in healthy volunteers.

Two different cefadroxil (CAS 50370-12-2) formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability in 24 healthy volunteers who received a single 500 mg oral dose of each preparation. An open, randomized clinical trial designed as a two-period crossover study with a 7-day washout period between doses was employed. Plasma samples for assessments of their cefadroxil concentration by HPLC-UV were obtained over 8 h after administration. Values of 48.94 +/- 10.18 pg x h/ml for test, and 48.51 +/- 9.02 microg x h/ml for the reference preparation AUC(0-t) demonstrate a nearly identical extend of drug absorption. Maximum plasma concentration Cmax of 16.04 +/- 4.94 microg/ml and 16.01 + 4.02 microg/ml achieved for the test and reference preparations did not differ significantly. The parametric 90% confidence intervals (CI) of the mean of the difference (test-reference) between log-transformed values of the two formulations were 96.80% to 104.51% and 92.01% to 107.00% for AUC(0-t) and Cmax, respectively. Since for both AUC(0-t) or Cmax the 90% CI values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test product is bioequivalent to the reference product for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.

HPLC-UV determination of metformin in human plasma for application in pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence studies.

In this study, a simple, rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection is described for determination of metformin in plasma samples from bioequivalence assays. Sample preparation was accomplished through protein precipitation with acetonitrile and chromatographic separation was performed on a reversed-phase phenyl column at 40 degrees C. Mobile phase consisted of a mixture of phosphate buffer and acetonitrile at flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. Wavelength was set at 236 nm. The method was applied to a bioequivalence study of two drug products containing metformin, and allowed determination of metformin at low concentrations with a higher throughput than previously described methods.

Bioequivalence evaluation of two different tablet formulations of tinidazole in healthy volunteers.

The bioequivalence of two different tablet formulations of tinidazole (CAS 19387-91-8) was determined in healthy volunteers after a single dose in a randomized crossover study, with a 1-week washout period between the doses. Reference and test products were administered to 24 volunteers with 240 mL water after overnight fasting. Plasma concentrations of tinidazole were monitored by a high-performance liquid chromatographic method (HPLC) over a period of 72 h after the administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(o-t), AUCo-infinity, C(max), T(max), T((1/2)el) and beta were determined from plasma concentration time profile of both formulations and found to be in good agreement with previously reported values. The calculated pharmacokinetic parameters were compared statistically to evaluate bioequivalence between the two brands. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) did not show any significant difference between the two formulations and 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of C(max) (93.9 -102.6%), AUC(o-t) (94.9-101.1%) and AUC(o-infinity) (94.6-100.8%) values for the test and reference products were within the 80-125% interval, satisfying the bioequivalence criteria of the European Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products and the US Food and Drug Administration Guidelines. These results Indicate that the test and the reference products of tinidazole are bioequivalent and, thus, may be prescribed interchangeably.

Avaliação de diferentes cronogramas de coletas de amostras biológicas em estudos de bioequivalência e análise da influência de teor de fármaco sobre os resultados destes estudos / Evaluation of the effects on different doses and sampling schedules on the assessment of bioequivalence

Os estudos de bioequivalência são realizados em humanos, por meio da administração dos medicamentos em estudo pela mesma via extravascular, sob condições experimentais padronizadas, seguida pela determinação das concentrações plasmáticas do fármaco em função do tempo. Nestes estudos considera-se que curvas estatisticamente semelhantes de decaimento sanguíneo de fármacos produzem o mesmo resultado em termos de eficácia e segurança. A partir das curvas de concentração em função do tempo obtidas, determinam-se os parâmetros farmacocinéticos Cmax, tmax e ASC. A bioequivalência entre dois produtos é estabelecida por meio do IC 90%, que deve estar entre 80 a 125% para os parâmetros farmacocinéticos Cmax e ASC. O cronograma de coleta de amostras biológicas é um dos aspectos mais críticos no planejamento de estudos de bioequivalência, pois este afeta diretamente a determinação dos parâmetros farmacocinéticos utilizados na avaliação da bioequivalência. Outro aspecto importante relacionado a este tipo de estudo é a diferença de teor entre os produtos a serem submetidos ao estudo de bioequivalência, que segundo a legislação brasileira vigente, deve ser menor ou igual a 5%. Neste trabalho foram avaliados diferentes cronogramas de coleta de amostras sangue, avaliando-se o impacto destes no resultado final de um estudo de bioequivalência e, além disso, a influência da diferença de teor de fármaco entre dois produtos que levaria à bioinequivalência também foi investigada. Para tanto simulações matemáticas e um estudo in vivo foram conduzidos. O fármaco modelo escolhido foi a cefadroxila, por apresentar características farmacocinéticas e farmacodinâmicas ideais. O programa Microsoft Office Excel 2003 foi utilizado para simular as concentrações plasmáticas e determinar o IC 90%. As simulações foram feitas por meio de dois modelos: modelo baseado em máximos e mínimos de parâmetros farmacocinéticos, e modelo baseado em coeficientes de variação intra e inter-individuais do fármaco. Dez diferentes doses, entre -10% a 20% da dose referência, e 6 cronogramas de coleta foram avaliados. O estudo in vivo foi realizado com quatro doses diferentes de cefadroxila. A bioequivalência entre as doses e em diferentes cronogramas de coleta foi avaliada em 24 voluntários sadios do sexo masculino. Os voluntários receberam as quatro doses do estudo em desenho cruzado, em quatro períodos e quatro seqüências, com washout de 7 dias entre as doses. As concentrações plasmáticas de cefadroxila, até 8 horas após a administração, foram determinadas por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência com detecção DAD. Os parâmetros farmacocinéticos tmax, Cmax e AUC0-t foram determinados nas diferentes doses e cronogramas de coleta, sendo que o critério para estabelecer-se a bioequivalência foi baseada nos resultados do IC 90% dos parâmetros farmacocinéticos Cmax e AUC0-t. Os resultados obtidos nas simulações mostraram boa correlação com os dados reais obtidos a partir de estudos in vivo. As simulações baseadas em coeficientes de variação intra e inter-individuais descreveram melhor os resultados observados no estudo in vivo. De acordo com os resultados obtidos no estudo in vivo pode-se concluir que cronogramas de coletas com menos amostras são tão eficientes quanto cronogramas de coletas com mais amostras, desde que o tempo de tmax esteja incluído. Em relação ao teor de fármaco, concluiu-se que dois produtos com diferença de teor menor ou igual a 11% ainda são bioequivalentes e que diferença maior ou igual a 14% resultam em bioinequivalência. Observou-se ainda que o parâmetro farmacocinético ASC0-t é mais sensível que Cmax para detectar diferenças

Bioequivalence studies are designed to compare the in vivo performance of different formulations of the same drug or different drug products by a randomized crossover study. Pharmacokinetic parameters are obtained from the drug concentration-time profile in blood, serum, or plasma. The most frequently used pharmacokinetic parameters are area under the plasma or blood concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum concentration (Cmax) and time to achieve maximum concentration (tmax). Bioequivalence is concluded if the average bioavailability of the test formulation is within (80%, 125%) that of the reference formulation, with a certain assurance, that is, an equivalence criterion of 80% to 125% for assessment of bioequivalence based on the ratio of average bioavailability is employed. The logarithmic transformation is used for AUC and Cmax. Accuracy in measuring pharmacokinetics parameters directly affects accuracy of bioequivalence tests. Since the number of blood samples per patient is limited, sampling points should be chosen such that the time concentration profile is adequately defined so as to allow the calculation of relevant parameters. According to guidelines proposed by the National Agency of Sanitary Vigilance of Brazil (ANVISA), bioequivalence studies can be conducted only if the difference in drug content between the reference and test product is less than or equal to 5%. The goals of this study are to evaluate the influence of differences in amount of active moiety present in the formulation and possibility of reducing the number of sampling points in bioequivalence studies and to discuss the impact of these parameters in bioequivalence conclusions. For these approaches, simulations and an in vivo study were done. The drug selected was cefadroxil. Cefadroxil presents ideal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics characteristics for this kind of study, such as high bioavailability, low intra and intersubject variability, short elimination rate and wide therapeutic range. Microsoft Office Excel 2003 software was used to simulate drug concentration-time profiles for different doses and several sampling schedules, and to determine 90% confidence interval. Simulations were done by two models: a) based on assumed maximum and minimum pharmacokinetic parameters values; b) based on assumed intra and intersubject variability. Ten different doses, ranging from -10% to 20% of the reference dose, and six sampling schedules were evaluated. The in vivo study was performed with four different cefadroxil doses. Their relative bioavailability were evaluated in 24 healthy volunteers who received a single oral dose of each preparation. An open, randomized clinical trial designed as four-periods and four sequences crossover with 7-days washout between doses was employed. Plasma samples for assessments of their cefadroxil concentration by HPLC-DAD were obtained over 8 h after administration. Pharmacokinetics parameters tmax, Cmax and AUC0-t were evaluated using different doses and sampling schedules. For the purpose of bioequivalence analysis Cmax and AUC0-t were considered. For each schedule, to claim bioequivalence in average bioavailability, a 90% confidence interval was constructed for ratio of average between test and reference products and compared with (80%, 125%) limits. If the constructed confidence interval falls within the limits, then the two formulations are considered bioequivalent. The results obtained by simulate time-concentration profiles, showed good correlation with real data. Comparing the results obtained through in vivo study and the two simulations models, the simulations based in intra and intersubject variability was more predictive. In conclusion, no significant differences were found between sampling schedules evaluated, since the sampling time around tmax were maintained in sampling schedules. Bioinequivalence was observed when the difference between cefadroxil doses was higher than 14%. The parameter AUC0-t was more sensitive than Cmax to detect differences

Bioavailability study of two oral formulations of didanosine in healthy volunteers.

An open-label, randomised, crossover single dose study, using 2 periods, 2 sequences, with a minimum washout period of 7 days, was conducted in order to assess the comparative bioavailability of two formulations of didanosine (CAS 69655-05-6) 100 mg tablets. Didanosine plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method [DAD detector, stavudine (CAS 3056-17-5) as an internal standard]. The limit of detection was 30 ng/ml. The results showed that overall classical 90 % confidence intervals (CI) were 92.4-111.2 % for AUC0-inf, 91.8-109.9 %f for AUC0-t, and 87.0-110.0 % for Cmax. Since the 90 % CI for both, AUC and Cmax ratios were within the 80-125 % interval proposed by the European Agency for the Evalution of Medicinal Products (EMEA) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), it is concluded that the new didanosine formulation is equivalent to the conventional formulation for both, the extent and the rate of absorption after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.

Método analítico para determinação de meloxicam em plasma humano por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência (CLAE) / Determination of meloxicam in human plasma by HPLC

Desenvolveu-se e validou-se método analítico simples, rápido e específico para quantificação de meloxicam (inibidor do COX-2) em plasma humano através da cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência, para aplicação em estudos de bioequivalência. Piroxicam foi utilizado como padrão interno. Empregou-se cromotografia em fase reversa com coluna modelo Synergi RP-MAX (150 X 4,6 mn0, à temperatura de 30 ºC e fase móvel constituída por mistura de acetonitrila e tampão fosfato 0,025 mol/L pH 4,5 (40:60, v/c4.v), a um fluxo de 1,0 mL/min. Os analitos foram detectados por UV a 364 nm. As amostras de plasma foram acidificadas com ácido clorídrico 1 mol/L, extraídas utilizando-se éter terc-butil metílico e, após filtração e secagem, o resíduo foi reconstituído em 250 mL de fase móvel para injeção em CLAE...

Determination of lamivudine in human plasma by HPLC and its use in bioequivalence studies.

A simple, accurate, precise and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method with ultraviolet detection was developed to quantificate lamivudine (3-TC) in human plasma samples from bioequivalence studies. 3-TC and stavudine (internal standard, I.S.) were extracted from 0.5 ml of human plasma by acetonitrile protein precipitation. The method was validated over a concentration range of 0.05-3.00 microg/ml and used in a bioequivalence trial between two lamivudine formulations, to assess its usefulness in this kind of study. FURP-lamivudine (Fundação para o Remédio Popular, Brazil, as test formulation) and Epivir (GlaxoSmithKline, Brazil, as reference formulation) were evaluated following a single 150 mg oral dose to 24 healthy volunteers of both genders. The dose was administered after an overnight fast according to a two-way crossover design. Bioequivalence between the products was determined by calculating 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) for the ratio of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf values for the test and reference products, using logarithmic transformed data. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of Cmax (0.86-1.06), AUC0-t (0.96-1.04) and AUC0-inf (0.97-1.05) values for the test and reference products are within the 0.80-1.25 interval proposed by FDA and EMEA. It was concluded that the two 3-TC formulations are bioequivalent in their rate and extent of absorption, and thus, may be used interchangeably.

Avaliaçäo da bioequivalência de comprimidos contendo levofloxacino 500 mg produzidos por Apsen Farmacêutica S/A e Aventis Pharma. Etapas clínica, analítica e estatística / Bioequivalence evaluation of tablets containg levofloxacin 500mg produced by Apsen Pharmaceuticals S/A and Aventis Pahrma. Clinical, analytical and statystical steps

Objetivos: Neste trabalho, se realizam etapas clínicas, analíticas e estatística de ensaio de bioequivalência em formulaçöes contendo levofloxacino produzidos por dois laboratórios farmacêuticos. Os objetivos foram: a) desenvolver e validar o método quantitativo (plasma); b) realizar ensaio clínico em voluntários sadios, adminitrando as duas formulaçöes; c) quantificar o levofloxacino no plasma dos voluntários; d) análise estatística para avaliar a bioequivalência entre os produtos. Material e Métodos: 1) Amostras: formulaçäo " teste" - levoxin ( Apsen Farmacêutica s/a) e formulaçäo referência - tavanic ( Aventis Pharma); 2) Ensaios de bioequivalência : Casuística - voluntários sadios, seguindo normas internacionais e resoluçäo 41/2000 Brasil (2000). Foi assinado termo de consentimento pelos 24 voluntários. Resultados / discussäo : O método analítico para quantificaçäo do levofloxacino em amostras ded plasma demonstrou boa especificidade , recuperaçäo, linearidade, limite de quantificaçäo, precisäo, exatidäo ,sensibilidade, facilidade na purificaçäo das amostras, tempo de análise e estabilidade ( 92 dias a -20 graus C). As curvas médias " concentraçäo plasmática versus tempo" para os produtos " referência" ( Tavanic) e " teste" ( levoxin) apresentaram peris de decaimento plasmático semelhantes, bem como as médias dos parâmetros farmacocinéticos: C max ( referência:6380,66 ng/mL; teste: 6398,03 ng/mL), AUC-0-t (referência :50.535,49 ng.h/mL; teste 50.240,81 ng.h/mL) e a AUC 0 - infinito ( referência:54.325,22 ng.h/mL;teste:53.719,64 ng.h/mL). A análise de variância (ANOVA) para os efeitos do produto, grupo e período em relaçäo aos parâmetros farmacocinéticos demonstrou ausência desses efeitos na Cmax, , AUC 0-t e AUC 0-infinito, comprovando planejamento e execuçäo adequados da etapa clínica. Os intervalos de confiança 90 (por cento) para as razöes dos parâmetros farmacocinéticos dos medicamentos em referência se apresentaram entre 80 (por cento) e 125(por cento), em concordância com os limites na ANVISA ( Brasil 2002), FDA e EMEA, caracterizando-se a bioequivalência entre os produtos avaliados. Conclusäo : Conforme os dados obtidos, ,pode-se considerar que os produtos Tavanic ( Aventis Pharma) e Levoxin ( apsen Farmacêutica S/A) säo bioequivalentes, sem prejuízo do efeito terapêutico.(au)